The flow of mystical interpretations from the first interpretations to the interpretation of Abdul Razzaq Kashani based on the “Royat”verse

     The Qurchr('39')an has long been the focus of many commentators of jurists, theologians, philosophers and muhaddith. And each, according to his own taste, has given an interpretation of its verses. But the Sufis and mystics, relying on their own discovery, intuition and knowledge, have interpreted the Qurchr('39')an in a way different from those of other commentators. In general, considering the course of these interpretations from the first to the later periods, we have noticed similarities and differences in their interpretive approaches. In order to understand the common and different features between these interpretations, and clarifying their currents, “Royat” verse (143 Araf) which is one of the verses considered in most Quranic interpretations, (even interpretations that selectively interpret the verses) is taken into consideration. It was chosen so that we could achieve the goals of the article. Therefore, in this research, the evolution of mystical interpretations from the first one to the interpretation of Abdul Razzaq Kashani have been examined with regard to this versre. The interpretations considered here are: Tafsir attributed to Imam Sadegh Salmichr('39')s , Haghayegh o tafsir, Lataief Al-Esharat Qoshairi, Kashf al-Asrar Meybodi, Araes Al-Bayan Roozbehan Baqli and The Tavilat Al Qurchr('39')an by Abdul Razzaq Kashani. The results of the research show that the interpretations of Siri go from simplicity to difficulty and that the interpreters have interpreted and coded based on the narration of the verse.